https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65914 The removal of the petitioner's name from revenue records and resulting demolition were held illegal because no notice or hearing was afforded and an earlier decree existed, making Section 38 inapplicable. The demolition and transfer of possession were not justified under Section 67 or Supreme Court guidelines. The state must rectify records, restore possession to the petitioner, pay Rs 20 lakh costs, conduct an administrative inquiry at additional chief secretary level to identify responsible officials, and recover the costs from those officials. en-us Fri, 26 Dec 2025 23:46:03 +0530 Fri, 26 Dec 2025 23:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65914 The removal of the petitioner's name from revenue records and resulting demolition were held illegal because no notice or hearing was afforded and an earlier decree existed, making Section 38 inapplicable. The demolition and transfer of possession were not justified under Section 67 or Supreme Court guidelines. The state must rectify records, restore possession to the petitioner, pay Rs 20 lakh costs, conduct an administrative inquiry at additional chief secretary level to identify responsible officials, and recover the costs from those officials. News - Fri, 26 Dec 2025 23:46:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65914