<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 104 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the show cause notice and adjudication order, emphasizing that the absence of the Commissioner&#039;s signature on the copies served to the appellant did not invalidate the proceedings. The appellant&#039;s objection raised at the appellate stage regarding the show cause notice was dismissed, as it was not raised earlier in the proceedings. The Tribunal examined relevant case law cited by both parties and concluded that the matter should be considered on its merits by the referring Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:07:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 104 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the show cause notice and adjudication order, emphasizing that the absence of the Commissioner&#039;s signature on the copies served to the appellant did not invalidate the proceedings. The appellant&#039;s objection raised at the appellate stage regarding the show cause notice was dismissed, as it was not raised earlier in the proceedings. The Tribunal examined relevant case law cited by both parties and concluded that the matter should be considered on its merits by the referring Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>