<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 102 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48932</link>
    <description>The department&#039;s classification of the product as ordinary Portland cement was upheld because the chemical examiner&#039;s test report, employee statements, and contemporaneous shift and production records consistently supported that finding. The assessee failed to produce any reliable contrary test report or other evidence showing that the goods cleared were not cement or that they qualified as exempt sagol under the claimed notification. On that evidence, the exemption claim was rejected, and the demand and penalties were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 102 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48932</link>
      <description>The department&#039;s classification of the product as ordinary Portland cement was upheld because the chemical examiner&#039;s test report, employee statements, and contemporaneous shift and production records consistently supported that finding. The assessee failed to produce any reliable contrary test report or other evidence showing that the goods cleared were not cement or that they qualified as exempt sagol under the claimed notification. On that evidence, the exemption claim was rejected, and the demand and penalties were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>