https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784001 In a commercial-quantity NDPS case, procedural objections to body search, sampling, and Section 52A compliance did not by themselves justify bail. The Court treated the alleged defects as matters for trial and held that the petitioner's admission that capsules were concealed in her body, together with voluntary submission to medical extraction, displaced reliance on Section 103 of the Customs Act at the bail stage. As the record showed conscious possession and active participation, and the petitioner's foreign nationality heightened flight risk, the mandatory twin conditions under Section 37 were not satisfied. Bail was therefore refused. en-us Wed, 24 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:20:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784001 In a commercial-quantity NDPS case, procedural objections to body search, sampling, and Section 52A compliance did not by themselves justify bail. The Court treated the alleged defects as matters for trial and held that the petitioner's admission that capsules were concealed in her body, together with voluntary submission to medical extraction, displaced reliance on Section 103 of the Customs Act at the bail stage. As the record showed conscious possession and active participation, and the petitioner's foreign nationality heightened flight risk, the mandatory twin conditions under Section 37 were not satisfied. Bail was therefore refused. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784001