https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784002 In a writ challenging a SCN and an adjudication order, including the vires of Central/State GST notifications extending the time for adjudication, the HC held that the assessee had already filed a detailed reply relying on invoices and confirmation letters, making the statutory appellate remedy efficacious; the writ was therefore not entertained and the assessee was relegated to appeal. The HC permitted filing of an appeal by 31 January 2026 with the requisite pre-deposit, directed payment of costs of Rs. 10,000 to a court welfare fund, and ordered that an appeal so filed shall not be treated as time-barred and must be decided on merits. en-us Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Dec 2025 12:48:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784002 In a writ challenging a SCN and an adjudication order, including the vires of Central/State GST notifications extending the time for adjudication, the HC held that the assessee had already filed a detailed reply relying on invoices and confirmation letters, making the statutory appellate remedy efficacious; the writ was therefore not entertained and the assessee was relegated to appeal. The HC permitted filing of an appeal by 31 January 2026 with the requisite pre-deposit, directed payment of costs of Rs. 10,000 to a court welfare fund, and ordered that an appeal so filed shall not be treated as time-barred and must be decided on merits. Case-Laws GST Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784002