<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Intra-group management service fees benchmarking under &quot;Other Method&quot;: cost-plus markups accepted; Nil arm&#039;s-length price adjustment deleted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95408</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether the arm&#039;s-length price of intra-group management service fees could be determined at Nil and whether the &quot;Other Method&quot; was the appropriate MAM. The assessee&#039;s cost-based benchmarking using internal mark-up policy (5% for support and 10% for managerial/technical services) was held consistent with OECD principles for low value-adding services and supported by contemporaneous documentation and cost allocation workings; consequently, Nil ALP could not be inferred merely by alleging no benefit or services. The corroborative TNMM, with the assessee&#039;s net cost-plus margin within the interquartile range of comparables, further validated arm&#039;s-length conditions. The Nil ALP adjustment was deleted, with a direction to verify the benchmarking in the TPSR applying &quot;Other Method&quot; as primary. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Intra-group management service fees benchmarking under &quot;Other Method&quot;: cost-plus markups accepted; Nil arm&#039;s-length price adjustment deleted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95408</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether the arm&#039;s-length price of intra-group management service fees could be determined at Nil and whether the &quot;Other Method&quot; was the appropriate MAM. The assessee&#039;s cost-based benchmarking using internal mark-up policy (5% for support and 10% for managerial/technical services) was held consistent with OECD principles for low value-adding services and supported by contemporaneous documentation and cost allocation workings; consequently, Nil ALP could not be inferred merely by alleging no benefit or services. The corroborative TNMM, with the assessee&#039;s net cost-plus margin within the interquartile range of comparables, further validated arm&#039;s-length conditions. The Nil ALP adjustment was deleted, with a direction to verify the benchmarking in the TPSR applying &quot;Other Method&quot; as primary. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>