<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 104 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48923</link>
    <description>A special compounded levy scheme under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act operates as a self-contained code for determination, payment, interest and penalty, so the general notice and limitation machinery under Section 11A does not apply to recovery of duty under that scheme. Capacity-based duty under the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 must be fixed on the basis of the machinery actually installed in the assessee&#039;s own unit, not by reference to parameters of other manufacturers. The challenged capacity determinations were therefore set aside for fresh redetermination in the identified matters, with the remaining appeals rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:24:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 104 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48923</link>
      <description>A special compounded levy scheme under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act operates as a self-contained code for determination, payment, interest and penalty, so the general notice and limitation machinery under Section 11A does not apply to recovery of duty under that scheme. Capacity-based duty under the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 must be fixed on the basis of the machinery actually installed in the assessee&#039;s own unit, not by reference to parameters of other manufacturers. The challenged capacity determinations were therefore set aside for fresh redetermination in the identified matters, with the remaining appeals rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>