<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1476 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783936</link>
    <description>An agreement to transfer secured assets after a demand notice and in breach of the SARFAESI restraint on dealing with such assets was unenforceable, so cancellation could not be sustained under undervalued-transaction provisions not properly pleaded. The record also showed a post-commencement restructuring involving related persons, a new LLP, and transfer of business and assets for nominal consideration, supporting a finding that the business was carried on to defeat creditors. On that basis, fraudulent trading was made out and the contribution directions were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 11:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1476 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783936</link>
      <description>An agreement to transfer secured assets after a demand notice and in breach of the SARFAESI restraint on dealing with such assets was unenforceable, so cancellation could not be sustained under undervalued-transaction provisions not properly pleaded. The record also showed a post-commencement restructuring involving related persons, a new LLP, and transfer of business and assets for nominal consideration, supporting a finding that the business was carried on to defeat creditors. On that basis, fraudulent trading was made out and the contribution directions were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>