https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783941 Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is confined to rectification of the register of members for wrongful entry, omission, or delay, and it cannot be used to compel issuance or validation of a share certificate. Because the applicant had not established a validly issued certificate or any proper foundation for a rectification claim, and the alleged certificate was defective and unsupported by the material required under company law, the dispute was treated as one over the issuance and validity of shares rather than register rectification. Rule 70 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 could not enlarge that substantive jurisdiction. The application was therefore held not maintainable. en-us Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783941 Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is confined to rectification of the register of members for wrongful entry, omission, or delay, and it cannot be used to compel issuance or validation of a share certificate. Because the applicant had not established a validly issued certificate or any proper foundation for a rectification claim, and the alleged certificate was defective and unsupported by the material required under company law, the dispute was treated as one over the issuance and validity of shares rather than register rectification. Rule 70 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 could not enlarge that substantive jurisdiction. The application was therefore held not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783941