<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 122 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48921</link>
    <description>Re-rollable scrap used for further manufacture through re-rolling was not waste and scrap within the meaning of the exemption notifications because it was not material generally used for remelting. Binding departmental circulars clarified that waste and scrap of iron and steel covered only remelting-grade material, so the goods could not be reclassified as waste and scrap merely because they arose from broken or used material. The denial of exemption on that basis was therefore unsustainable, and the exemption remained available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 122 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48921</link>
      <description>Re-rollable scrap used for further manufacture through re-rolling was not waste and scrap within the meaning of the exemption notifications because it was not material generally used for remelting. Binding departmental circulars clarified that waste and scrap of iron and steel covered only remelting-grade material, so the goods could not be reclassified as waste and scrap merely because they arose from broken or used material. The denial of exemption on that basis was therefore unsustainable, and the exemption remained available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>