https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783950 Preventive detention was upheld where the detention order referred to material showing the detenue's alleged role in a smuggling operation, including statements, seizure-related material, and surrounding circumstances, and the Court found no absence of subjective satisfaction or non-application of mind. The challenge based on non-supply of relied upon documents, translations, and the pen drive also failed because the Court found the material was furnished or shown, the disputed pages were not relied upon, and no prejudice to an effective representation was established. The Court further held that the representation was properly processed through the Central Government and Advisory Board, and no illegality arose from the detaining authority not revoking the detention. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783950 Preventive detention was upheld where the detention order referred to material showing the detenue's alleged role in a smuggling operation, including statements, seizure-related material, and surrounding circumstances, and the Court found no absence of subjective satisfaction or non-application of mind. The challenge based on non-supply of relied upon documents, translations, and the pen drive also failed because the Court found the material was furnished or shown, the disputed pages were not relied upon, and no prejudice to an effective representation was established. The Court further held that the representation was properly processed through the Central Government and Advisory Board, and no illegality arose from the detaining authority not revoking the detention. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783950