<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1512 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783972</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether late fee under s. 234E could be levied for delay in filing TDS statements for a period prior to 01.06.2015 while processing under s. 143(1). Applying its earlier decision, the ITAT held that, before 01.06.2015, the processing provisions did not permit imposition of s. 234E fee through an intimation under s. 143(1); accordingly, any such levy was without authority of law. The appeal was allowed and the late fee was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1512 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783972</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether late fee under s. 234E could be levied for delay in filing TDS statements for a period prior to 01.06.2015 while processing under s. 143(1). Applying its earlier decision, the ITAT held that, before 01.06.2015, the processing provisions did not permit imposition of s. 234E fee through an intimation under s. 143(1); accordingly, any such levy was without authority of law. The appeal was allowed and the late fee was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>