<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1527 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783987</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was the validity of a transfer order under s.127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 shifting an assessee&#039;s assessment jurisdiction from one station to another. The HC held s.127 is a machinery provision exercisable for administrative convenience in public interest to facilitate effective investigation and coordinated assessment, provided the assessee is given reasonable opportunity and the order records reasons; absent pleaded mala fides or violation of fundamental rights, judicial interference is limited. As adequate hearing was granted, the order was a speaking order with acceptable reasons, and no mala fides were alleged, the transfer was upheld and the writ petition was dismissed. The plea that material should instead have been forwarded under s.158BD was rejected, as connected cases may be centralized under s.127.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1527 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783987</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was the validity of a transfer order under s.127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 shifting an assessee&#039;s assessment jurisdiction from one station to another. The HC held s.127 is a machinery provision exercisable for administrative convenience in public interest to facilitate effective investigation and coordinated assessment, provided the assessee is given reasonable opportunity and the order records reasons; absent pleaded mala fides or violation of fundamental rights, judicial interference is limited. As adequate hearing was granted, the order was a speaking order with acceptable reasons, and no mala fides were alleged, the transfer was upheld and the writ petition was dismissed. The plea that material should instead have been forwarded under s.158BD was rejected, as connected cases may be centralized under s.127.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>