<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1532 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783992</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether the AO could deny a nil withholding certificate under s.197 for receipts from software licensing/services by applying an 8.75% rate premised on the taxpayer having a dependent agent PE in India under the India-USA DTAA. The HC held that taxability must be determined assessment-year-wise and that the ITAT&#039;s findings for AYs 2021-22 and 2022-23 that no such PE existed conclusively governed taxability for those years; absent any assessment finding of a PE for later years, the PE premise could not be assumed. Since the challenge for AY 2024-25 was withdrawn, the AO was directed to reconsider the s.197 certificate for AY 2025-26 afresh on that year&#039;s facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1532 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783992</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether the AO could deny a nil withholding certificate under s.197 for receipts from software licensing/services by applying an 8.75% rate premised on the taxpayer having a dependent agent PE in India under the India-USA DTAA. The HC held that taxability must be determined assessment-year-wise and that the ITAT&#039;s findings for AYs 2021-22 and 2022-23 that no such PE existed conclusively governed taxability for those years; absent any assessment finding of a PE for later years, the PE premise could not be assumed. Since the challenge for AY 2024-25 was withdrawn, the AO was directed to reconsider the s.197 certificate for AY 2025-26 afresh on that year&#039;s facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>