<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 101 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48915</link>
    <description>Classification of the imported goods under the Customs Tariff Act was resolved by applying the Supreme Court ruling in Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi v. Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd. The Tribunal held that the goods fall under Heading 49.06 and that duty is attracted under Heading 98.03. The classification issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of Revenue, fixing the consequential duty liability on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:10:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 101 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48915</link>
      <description>Classification of the imported goods under the Customs Tariff Act was resolved by applying the Supreme Court ruling in Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi v. Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd. The Tribunal held that the goods fall under Heading 49.06 and that duty is attracted under Heading 98.03. The classification issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of Revenue, fixing the consequential duty liability on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>