<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 92 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48910</link>
    <description>Modvat credit validly taken when the final product was dutiable does not become irregular merely because the product is later exempted. Reversal is required only to the extent that duty paid inputs remain attributable to exempt clearances of unfinished or uncleared goods. On that basis, separate recovery of duty was not justified, and penalty and interest were not sustainable where the credit was originally validly availed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:02:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 92 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48910</link>
      <description>Modvat credit validly taken when the final product was dutiable does not become irregular merely because the product is later exempted. Reversal is required only to the extent that duty paid inputs remain attributable to exempt clearances of unfinished or uncleared goods. On that basis, separate recovery of duty was not justified, and penalty and interest were not sustainable where the credit was originally validly availed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>