<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1441 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465455</link>
    <description>A 68-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the delay was explained by advanced age, illness, bereavement and inability to take a timely decision. The court also considered that the appeal challenged an order dismissing the suit as not maintainable and found no prejudice to the respondent that outweighed hearing the matter on merits. The appeal was directed to be registered, and the delay objection was removed at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 19:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1441 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465455</link>
      <description>A 68-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the delay was explained by advanced age, illness, bereavement and inability to take a timely decision. The court also considered that the appeal challenged an order dismissing the suit as not maintainable and found no prejudice to the respondent that outweighed hearing the matter on merits. The appeal was directed to be registered, and the delay objection was removed at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>