<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1579 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465457</link>
    <description>Addition for alleged shortfall between search-admitted income and returned income turned on whether the discrepancy was already covered by group-wide disclosures, including an additional amount offered for possible errors/omissions and separate disclosures by other family members for the same AY. As verification of such set-off evidence was not undertaken, the issue was remanded to the AO to allow the assessee to substantiate that other group members&#039; disclosures neutralize the discrepancy; the ground was allowed for statistical purposes. Disallowance of declared agricultural income depended on the extent to which it was proved as agricultural; the ITAT held 90% as agricultural income and treated 10% as &quot;income from other sources,&quot; reducing the sustained disallowance; the ground was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1579 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465457</link>
      <description>Addition for alleged shortfall between search-admitted income and returned income turned on whether the discrepancy was already covered by group-wide disclosures, including an additional amount offered for possible errors/omissions and separate disclosures by other family members for the same AY. As verification of such set-off evidence was not undertaken, the issue was remanded to the AO to allow the assessee to substantiate that other group members&#039; disclosures neutralize the discrepancy; the ground was allowed for statistical purposes. Disallowance of declared agricultural income depended on the extent to which it was proved as agricultural; the ITAT held 90% as agricultural income and treated 10% as &quot;income from other sources,&quot; reducing the sustained disallowance; the ground was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>