https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465448 Interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was granted because the club suspension was prima facie inconsistent with the bye-laws and natural justice. The Court found that proper notice, required concurrence, and a duly initiated enquiry had not been followed, making the impugned suspension procedurally invalid. It also held that the balance of convenience favoured the petitioner, as continued exclusion from the club would cause irreversible prejudice that could not be adequately repaired later. On that basis, the petitioner was entitled to interim protection and the revision was allowed. en-us Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Dec 2025 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465448 Interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was granted because the club suspension was prima facie inconsistent with the bye-laws and natural justice. The Court found that proper notice, required concurrence, and a duly initiated enquiry had not been followed, making the impugned suspension procedurally invalid. It also held that the balance of convenience favoured the petitioner, as continued exclusion from the club would cause irreversible prejudice that could not be adequately repaired later. On that basis, the petitioner was entitled to interim protection and the revision was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465448