<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HC stays action by 3 banks against Anil Ambani, Reliance Communications; says RBI directions violated</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65727</link>
    <description>The core issue was whether a forensic audit lacking signature by a duly qualified chartered accountant and prepared by a firm with prior consultancy ties to the banks could validly support classification of accounts as fraud accounts, given that applicable regulatory master directions require specific auditor eligibility and engagement procedures and that designation carries severe credit, reputational, and legal consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HC stays action by 3 banks against Anil Ambani, Reliance Communications; says RBI directions violated</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65727</link>
      <description>The core issue was whether a forensic audit lacking signature by a duly qualified chartered accountant and prepared by a firm with prior consultancy ties to the banks could validly support classification of accounts as fraud accounts, given that applicable regulatory master directions require specific auditor eligibility and engagement procedures and that designation carries severe credit, reputational, and legal consequences.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>