<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 101 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48903</link>
    <description>Refund of excise duty paid after an exemption notification came into force was held outside the scope of the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986 because that scheme applies only to duties that would not have been collected if the notification had operated at all material times. The assessments were not shown to be provisional, as no contemporaneous record supported that contention. In the absence of provisional assessment, the refund claim had to satisfy the ordinary six-month limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, and the claim was filed beyond that period. The Revenue&#039;s demand was accordingly sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 101 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48903</link>
      <description>Refund of excise duty paid after an exemption notification came into force was held outside the scope of the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986 because that scheme applies only to duties that would not have been collected if the notification had operated at all material times. The assessments were not shown to be provisional, as no contemporaneous record supported that contention. In the absence of provisional assessment, the refund claim had to satisfy the ordinary six-month limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, and the claim was filed beyond that period. The Revenue&#039;s demand was accordingly sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>