<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 68 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48902</link>
    <description>The case involved allegations of infringement of law related to Modvat credit on melting scrap, diversion of imported scrap, duty demand on unreceived quantities, and diversion of scrap without evidence. The Tribunal remanded the matter for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for correct assessments and evidence to support the allegations. The appeals were allowed for a de novo review based on a reconciliation chart and other necessary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 68 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48902</link>
      <description>The case involved allegations of infringement of law related to Modvat credit on melting scrap, diversion of imported scrap, duty demand on unreceived quantities, and diversion of scrap without evidence. The Tribunal remanded the matter for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for correct assessments and evidence to support the allegations. The appeals were allowed for a de novo review based on a reconciliation chart and other necessary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>