<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 100 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48901</link>
    <description>Applying an earlier Larger Bench ruling on similar tariff entries, Microvit E Promix 50 was treated as a preparation used in animal feeding rather than a vitamin E preparation of Chapter 29. The classification therefore fell under Heading 23.09 for Customs purposes and Heading 23.02 for Central Excise purposes, and the Customs House classification under Heading 2936.28 and Heading 2936.00 was not accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 100 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48901</link>
      <description>Applying an earlier Larger Bench ruling on similar tariff entries, Microvit E Promix 50 was treated as a preparation used in animal feeding rather than a vitamin E preparation of Chapter 29. The classification therefore fell under Heading 23.09 for Customs purposes and Heading 23.02 for Central Excise purposes, and the Customs House classification under Heading 2936.28 and Heading 2936.00 was not accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>