<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 80 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Sections 27 and 154 of the Customs Act must be read together, and the time limitations of Section 27(1) apply to refunds resulting from corrections under Section 154. The appeal was disposed of, upholding the rejection of the refund claim as time-barred under Section 27(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 80 - CEGAT, COURT NO. III, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Sections 27 and 154 of the Customs Act must be read together, and the time limitations of Section 27(1) apply to refunds resulting from corrections under Section 154. The appeal was disposed of, upholding the rejection of the refund claim as time-barred under Section 27(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>