<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Satellite transmission service fees paid from India-whether taxable as &quot;royalty&quot; under Article 12 despite s. 9(1)(vi) changes; held not royalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95365</link>
    <description>Receipts from India for satellite transmission services were assessed as &quot;process royalty&quot; and &quot;equipment royalty&quot; under s. 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-Hong Kong DTAA. The tribunal held that a DTAA, being akin to negotiated legislation, cannot be unilaterally widened by subsequent domestic-law amendments; where the DTAA defines &quot;royalty&quot; more narrowly, the Revenue cannot superimpose the expanded domestic definition to defeat treaty protection. Applying Article 12, the fees for satellite transmission services were held not to constitute &quot;royalty&quot;, and by virtue of s. 90(2), the more beneficial treaty provision prevailed, resulting in deletion of the royalty characterization and relief to the assessee - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Satellite transmission service fees paid from India-whether taxable as &quot;royalty&quot; under Article 12 despite s. 9(1)(vi) changes; held not royalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95365</link>
      <description>Receipts from India for satellite transmission services were assessed as &quot;process royalty&quot; and &quot;equipment royalty&quot; under s. 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-Hong Kong DTAA. The tribunal held that a DTAA, being akin to negotiated legislation, cannot be unilaterally widened by subsequent domestic-law amendments; where the DTAA defines &quot;royalty&quot; more narrowly, the Revenue cannot superimpose the expanded domestic definition to defeat treaty protection. Applying Article 12, the fees for satellite transmission services were held not to constitute &quot;royalty&quot;, and by virtue of s. 90(2), the more beneficial treaty provision prevailed, resulting in deletion of the royalty characterization and relief to the assessee - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>