<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 158 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48897</link>
    <description>Gate passes issued before 1-4-94 could support Modvat credit only if the credit was taken on or before 30-6-94 under Notification No. 16/94-C.E. (N.T.), issued under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal treated that date as a mandatory outer limit and held that credit taken after 30-6-94 was not admissible, even where the inputs had been received and used in the factory. The result was that the Modvat credit was denied and the demand sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 158 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48897</link>
      <description>Gate passes issued before 1-4-94 could support Modvat credit only if the credit was taken on or before 30-6-94 under Notification No. 16/94-C.E. (N.T.), issued under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal treated that date as a mandatory outer limit and held that credit taken after 30-6-94 was not admissible, even where the inputs had been received and used in the factory. The result was that the Modvat credit was denied and the demand sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>