<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Import seizure memos and lab test reports challenged; petitions dismissed as territorial jurisdiction lay where goods were handled</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95359</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging seizure memos and laboratory test reports were held not maintainable for lack of territorial jurisdiction. Applying the Full Bench test that, beyond a formal cause of action, the court must consider forum conveniens under Article 226, it was held that mere presence of the investigating agency&#039;s headquarters or the testing laboratory in Delhi does not confer jurisdiction when the imports, storage, sampling, service of seizure memos, and the petitioners&#039; location are all in Tamil Nadu; testing in Delhi was only incidental and could have occurred elsewhere. The petitions were dismissed with liberty to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Import seizure memos and lab test reports challenged; petitions dismissed as territorial jurisdiction lay where goods were handled</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95359</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging seizure memos and laboratory test reports were held not maintainable for lack of territorial jurisdiction. Applying the Full Bench test that, beyond a formal cause of action, the court must consider forum conveniens under Article 226, it was held that mere presence of the investigating agency&#039;s headquarters or the testing laboratory in Delhi does not confer jurisdiction when the imports, storage, sampling, service of seizure memos, and the petitioners&#039; location are all in Tamil Nadu; testing in Delhi was only incidental and could have occurred elsewhere. The petitions were dismissed with liberty to pursue remedies before the appropriate forum. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>