https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783838 Claims based on the right to be forgotten, privacy and dignity were not rejected at the threshold on limitation where the plaintiff moved the civil court soon after criminal proceedings ended in his favour. The court treated entitlement to the reliefs as a matter for trial, rather than a preliminary bar under Article 75 of the Limitation Act. It also upheld interim restraint after balancing free speech under Article 19(1)(a) against dignity and privacy under Article 21, noting that continued online publication after exoneration could cause ongoing reputational harm and that later updates did not fully neutralise the effect of the original reports. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783838 Claims based on the right to be forgotten, privacy and dignity were not rejected at the threshold on limitation where the plaintiff moved the civil court soon after criminal proceedings ended in his favour. The court treated entitlement to the reliefs as a matter for trial, rather than a preliminary bar under Article 75 of the Limitation Act. It also upheld interim restraint after balancing free speech under Article 19(1)(a) against dignity and privacy under Article 21, noting that continued online publication after exoneration could cause ongoing reputational harm and that later updates did not fully neutralise the effect of the original reports. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783838