https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783840 A suit alleging continuing intellectual property infringement may contemplate urgent interim relief under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, so pre-institution mediation is not mandatory where the plaint, supporting material and cause of action show immediacy from the plaintiff's standpoint. The assessment is made on a wholesome reading of the pleadings and documents, not by testing the ultimate merits of the injunction prayer. Continuing acts of manufacture, sale or offer for sale constitute fresh and recurring wrongs, and the risk of irreparable harm to goodwill, reputation, proprietary rights, consumer confusion and deception can justify urgency. Mere delay in filing the suit does not, by itself, negate that urgency. en-us Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783840 A suit alleging continuing intellectual property infringement may contemplate urgent interim relief under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, so pre-institution mediation is not mandatory where the plaint, supporting material and cause of action show immediacy from the plaintiff's standpoint. The assessment is made on a wholesome reading of the pleadings and documents, not by testing the ultimate merits of the injunction prayer. Continuing acts of manufacture, sale or offer for sale constitute fresh and recurring wrongs, and the risk of irreparable harm to goodwill, reputation, proprietary rights, consumer confusion and deception can justify urgency. Mere delay in filing the suit does not, by itself, negate that urgency. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783840