https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783845 The dominant issue was maintainability of a writ seeking revival of an order, despite an available statutory appellate remedy, on the plea of financial inability to comply with the pre-deposit condition. The HC held that once the petitioner had already been relegated to the Appellate Tribunal, it would not entertain a further application to bypass that remedy. The SC found no ground to interfere under Article 136, and dismissed the SLPs, leaving the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy subject to the pre-deposit requirement. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783845 The dominant issue was maintainability of a writ seeking revival of an order, despite an available statutory appellate remedy, on the plea of financial inability to comply with the pre-deposit condition. The HC held that once the petitioner had already been relegated to the Appellate Tribunal, it would not entertain a further application to bypass that remedy. The SC found no ground to interfere under Article 136, and dismissed the SLPs, leaving the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy subject to the pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783845