<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783881</link>
    <description>Section 70(2) permits intra-head set-off of short-term capital loss without prescribing any mandatory sequencing between STCG taxable at normal rates and STCG subject to concessional rates; in the absence of an express statutory bar, the assessee&#039;s chosen order of set-off cannot be displaced merely because it lowers tax, so the AO/DRP&#039;s forced set-off against concessional-rate STCG was rejected and the assessee&#039;s computation was directed to be accepted. Dividend on ADR/GDR held by a non-resident is governed by sections 115AC and 196D and had already suffered TDS; taxing it again and denying credit due to Form 26AS/rule 37BA mismatches would cause impermissible double taxation and violate sections 199 and 205, so the addition and denial of TDS credit were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783881</link>
      <description>Section 70(2) permits intra-head set-off of short-term capital loss without prescribing any mandatory sequencing between STCG taxable at normal rates and STCG subject to concessional rates; in the absence of an express statutory bar, the assessee&#039;s chosen order of set-off cannot be displaced merely because it lowers tax, so the AO/DRP&#039;s forced set-off against concessional-rate STCG was rejected and the assessee&#039;s computation was directed to be accepted. Dividend on ADR/GDR held by a non-resident is governed by sections 115AC and 196D and had already suffered TDS; taxing it again and denying credit due to Form 26AS/rule 37BA mismatches would cause impermissible double taxation and violate sections 199 and 205, so the addition and denial of TDS credit were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>