<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1432 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783892</link>
    <description>Whether repairs and maintenance on plant and machinery were capital in nature was determined by assessing whether the outlay resulted in acquisition/replacement of an independent asset or conferred an enduring benefit. As the expenditure related only to minor replacement of parts/pipeline and components of the effluent treatment process, without replacing any plant or creating a new asset, it was held to be revenue; the disallowance as enhanced by CIT(A) was deleted. Whether professional charges were disallowable as share-capital related was decided by identifying the specific services. Fees for share transfer work, share capital audit reconciliation, and listing of equity shares were not for fresh issue of share capital and were allowable under s. 37(1); the AO was directed to delete the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1432 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783892</link>
      <description>Whether repairs and maintenance on plant and machinery were capital in nature was determined by assessing whether the outlay resulted in acquisition/replacement of an independent asset or conferred an enduring benefit. As the expenditure related only to minor replacement of parts/pipeline and components of the effluent treatment process, without replacing any plant or creating a new asset, it was held to be revenue; the disallowance as enhanced by CIT(A) was deleted. Whether professional charges were disallowable as share-capital related was decided by identifying the specific services. Fees for share transfer work, share capital audit reconciliation, and listing of equity shares were not for fresh issue of share capital and were allowable under s. 37(1); the AO was directed to delete the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>