<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1447 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783907</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was breach of natural justice in a GST composition assessment, as the demand was confirmed without issuance of a proper SCN in Form GST DRC-01, despite the authority computing suppressed turnover by comparing nominal CMP-08 turnover with substantial purchases and adding a presumptive gross profit to levy tax at 18%. Holding that the appellate limitation under s.107 had expired but that such defect warranted interference, the HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for a fresh order, conditional upon the assessee depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1447 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783907</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was breach of natural justice in a GST composition assessment, as the demand was confirmed without issuance of a proper SCN in Form GST DRC-01, despite the authority computing suppressed turnover by comparing nominal CMP-08 turnover with substantial purchases and adding a presumptive gross profit to levy tax at 18%. Holding that the appellate limitation under s.107 had expired but that such defect warranted interference, the HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for a fresh order, conditional upon the assessee depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>