<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1453 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783913</link>
    <description>An ex parte GST assessment was challenged for breach of natural justice as the show cause notice was only uploaded on the portal and no personal hearing was afforded. The HC held that while portal upload is a statutorily valid mode of service, where repeated portal notices elicit no response the proper officer must apply mind and attempt alternate modes under s.169(1) (preferably RPAD) to ensure effective service; otherwise confirmation of proposals without hearing amounts to empty formality and violates natural justice. The assessment order was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, conditional on the taxpayer depositing 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, with quashing effective upon such payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1453 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783913</link>
      <description>An ex parte GST assessment was challenged for breach of natural justice as the show cause notice was only uploaded on the portal and no personal hearing was afforded. The HC held that while portal upload is a statutorily valid mode of service, where repeated portal notices elicit no response the proper officer must apply mind and attempt alternate modes under s.169(1) (preferably RPAD) to ensure effective service; otherwise confirmation of proposals without hearing amounts to empty formality and violates natural justice. The assessment order was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, conditional on the taxpayer depositing 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, with quashing effective upon such payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>