<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1514 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465430</link>
    <description>Extension in service after superannuation under Rule 143 of the Haryana Civil Services (General) Rules, 2016 is permissible only in exceptional circumstances and in public interest. The record showed no exceptional circumstance or administrative necessity to justify retention in service, and representations from local residents did not establish public interest. Alleged extensions granted to other employees were unsupported by particulars, and any irregular extension elsewhere could not create a right in favour of the employee. The rejection of the request for extension in service was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:22:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1514 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465430</link>
      <description>Extension in service after superannuation under Rule 143 of the Haryana Civil Services (General) Rules, 2016 is permissible only in exceptional circumstances and in public interest. The record showed no exceptional circumstance or administrative necessity to justify retention in service, and representations from local residents did not establish public interest. Alleged extensions granted to other employees were unsupported by particulars, and any irregular extension elsewhere could not create a right in favour of the employee. The rejection of the request for extension in service was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>