<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 67 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the process of fixing deflection yoke with television picture tubes constituted &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. By transforming components into a television sub-assembly through specific steps like setting a magnet assembly and degaussing, the Tribunal concluded that this process resulted in the creation of a distinct product. As a result, the appellants were eligible for the benefit of Notification 97/91-C.E., entitling them to a concessional rate of duty. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, recognizing the fixing of the deflection yoke with television picture tubes as a manufacturing activity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:22:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 67 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the process of fixing deflection yoke with television picture tubes constituted &quot;manufacture&quot; under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. By transforming components into a television sub-assembly through specific steps like setting a magnet assembly and degaussing, the Tribunal concluded that this process resulted in the creation of a distinct product. As a result, the appellants were eligible for the benefit of Notification 97/91-C.E., entitling them to a concessional rate of duty. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, recognizing the fixing of the deflection yoke with television picture tubes as a manufacturing activity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>