<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 111 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48869</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. I, New Delhi, addressed a dispute concerning the valuation of aerated waters for Central Excise duty calculation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s goods had varying maximum retail prices (MRPs) for different regions, leading to duty evasion allegations by the Department. The Tribunal ruled that duty should be calculated based on the MRP printed on the packet, rejecting the Department&#039;s claim for duty based on higher MRPs from other regions. The appeal was allowed, overturning the duty demand and providing consequential reliefs to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 111 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48869</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. I, New Delhi, addressed a dispute concerning the valuation of aerated waters for Central Excise duty calculation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s goods had varying maximum retail prices (MRPs) for different regions, leading to duty evasion allegations by the Department. The Tribunal ruled that duty should be calculated based on the MRP printed on the packet, rejecting the Department&#039;s claim for duty based on higher MRPs from other regions. The appeal was allowed, overturning the duty demand and providing consequential reliefs to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>