<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Share premium received by deemed public company: section 56(2)(viib) taxability barred; addition deleted, appeal allowed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95314</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether share premium could be taxed as income under section 56(2)(viib) when the assessee had become a deemed public company. Since the assessee became a subsidiary of a public company in which the public were substantially interested, it qualified as a deemed public company under section 2(18). As section 56(2)(viib) excludes companies in which the public are substantially interested, the statutory condition for invoking section 56(2)(viib) failed; consequently, the share premium addition lacked legal foundation and was directed to be deleted, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Share premium received by deemed public company: section 56(2)(viib) taxability barred; addition deleted, appeal allowed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95314</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether share premium could be taxed as income under section 56(2)(viib) when the assessee had become a deemed public company. Since the assessee became a subsidiary of a public company in which the public were substantially interested, it qualified as a deemed public company under section 2(18). As section 56(2)(viib) excludes companies in which the public are substantially interested, the statutory condition for invoking section 56(2)(viib) failed; consequently, the share premium addition lacked legal foundation and was directed to be deleted, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>