<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1303 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783763</link>
    <description>Article 22(1) requires that the grounds of arrest be effectively communicated, and Section 50 CrPC supports that safeguard by requiring notice of the basis of arrest. On the facts, the arrest memo supplied to the applicant recorded the factual basis of arrest, including demand and acceptance of bribe, and was treated as written communication of the grounds. The Court held that a separate sheet was not legally necessary where the arrest memo itself conveyed those grounds. Sufficient compliance with Article 22(1) was therefore found, no violation of fundamental rights was established, and the bail plea was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1303 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783763</link>
      <description>Article 22(1) requires that the grounds of arrest be effectively communicated, and Section 50 CrPC supports that safeguard by requiring notice of the basis of arrest. On the facts, the arrest memo supplied to the applicant recorded the factual basis of arrest, including demand and acceptance of bribe, and was treated as written communication of the grounds. The Court held that a separate sheet was not legally necessary where the arrest memo itself conveyed those grounds. Sufficient compliance with Article 22(1) was therefore found, no violation of fundamental rights was established, and the bail plea was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>