<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1304 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783764</link>
    <description>A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be quashed at the pre-trial stage only if the allegations and materials fail to disclose a prima facie case. Where the complaint pleads cheque issuance, dishonour for insufficient funds, service of demand notice, and non-payment within the statutory period, the ingredients of Section 138 are prima facie satisfied. The Section 139 presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a debt or liability is rebuttable, but ordinarily only through evidence at trial; a court exercising Section 482 jurisdiction cannot conduct a roving enquiry into disputed defences. The complaint and summoning order therefore should not be quashed before trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1304 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783764</link>
      <description>A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be quashed at the pre-trial stage only if the allegations and materials fail to disclose a prima facie case. Where the complaint pleads cheque issuance, dishonour for insufficient funds, service of demand notice, and non-payment within the statutory period, the ingredients of Section 138 are prima facie satisfied. The Section 139 presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a debt or liability is rebuttable, but ordinarily only through evidence at trial; a court exercising Section 482 jurisdiction cannot conduct a roving enquiry into disputed defences. The complaint and summoning order therefore should not be quashed before trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>