https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48864 Following the Delhi High Court's direction, the Tribunal treated the delay in filing appeal E/645/95-A as condoned and allowed the restoration application, thereby restoring the appeal for hearing on merits. The Tribunal noted that the appeal had earlier been dismissed as time-barred and that the appellants had not relisted it, but nevertheless exercised its power to revive the matter in compliance with the writ direction. It also left open for the appellants to seek, before the appropriate bench, a joint hearing of the restored appeal with the connected appeal, leaving that procedural request to the competent bench. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:51:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48864 Following the Delhi High Court's direction, the Tribunal treated the delay in filing appeal E/645/95-A as condoned and allowed the restoration application, thereby restoring the appeal for hearing on merits. The Tribunal noted that the appeal had earlier been dismissed as time-barred and that the appellants had not relisted it, but nevertheless exercised its power to revive the matter in compliance with the writ direction. It also left open for the appellants to seek, before the appropriate bench, a joint hearing of the restored appeal with the connected appeal, leaving that procedural request to the competent bench. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48864