https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783782 An application sought recall of an appellate order on the ground that the judgment date in a company appeal was wrongly mentioned. The Tribunal held that it has inherent power to recall its own orders only in limited circumstances, namely where the order is without jurisdiction, obtained by fraud or collusion, vitiated by a fundamental procedural defect (including non-service on a necessary party), passed on a misunderstanding of facts causing prejudice, or results in gross failure of justice. As none of these jurisdictional or procedural preconditions for recall were established on the facts, the recall application was rejected and disposed of. en-us Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783782 An application sought recall of an appellate order on the ground that the judgment date in a company appeal was wrongly mentioned. The Tribunal held that it has inherent power to recall its own orders only in limited circumstances, namely where the order is without jurisdiction, obtained by fraud or collusion, vitiated by a fundamental procedural defect (including non-service on a necessary party), passed on a misunderstanding of facts causing prejudice, or results in gross failure of justice. As none of these jurisdictional or procedural preconditions for recall were established on the facts, the recall application was rejected and disposed of. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783782