<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783791</link>
    <description>Advances/credits arising from purchase and sale of timeshare weeks with group concerns were held to be commercial transactions supported by consideration and indirect tax payment; applying CBDT Circular No. 19/2017, s. 2(22)(e) was inapplicable, and the Revenue&#039;s deemed-dividend ground was dismissed. Commission expenditure was allowed because the assessee furnished adequate particulars, non-response/non-confirmation by payees after discontinuance of the arrangement was insufficient to disallow, and there was no evidence of cash-back or unaccounted receipt; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Depreciation on capitalised timeshare weeks was sustained as part of the building block/cost of improvement, consistent with subsequent-year treatment and taxation of fractional ownership gains; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Ad hoc disallowance of foreign travel was deleted for lack of method once travel details were produced; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. An assessment framed in the name of an amalgamated, non-existent entity was held void for want of jurisdiction, not curable under s. 292B, and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783791</link>
      <description>Advances/credits arising from purchase and sale of timeshare weeks with group concerns were held to be commercial transactions supported by consideration and indirect tax payment; applying CBDT Circular No. 19/2017, s. 2(22)(e) was inapplicable, and the Revenue&#039;s deemed-dividend ground was dismissed. Commission expenditure was allowed because the assessee furnished adequate particulars, non-response/non-confirmation by payees after discontinuance of the arrangement was insufficient to disallow, and there was no evidence of cash-back or unaccounted receipt; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Depreciation on capitalised timeshare weeks was sustained as part of the building block/cost of improvement, consistent with subsequent-year treatment and taxation of fractional ownership gains; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. Ad hoc disallowance of foreign travel was deleted for lack of method once travel details were produced; the Revenue&#039;s ground was dismissed. An assessment framed in the name of an amalgamated, non-existent entity was held void for want of jurisdiction, not curable under s. 292B, and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>