<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1332 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783792</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was the validity of an assessment framed under s. 153A r/w s. 143(3) based on material seized in a search of a third party. The ITAT held that s. 153A can be invoked only where a search is conducted on the assessee and incriminating material is found at the assessee&#039;s premises; if the AO seeks to rely on third-party search material, the proper jurisdictional provision is s. 153C. The assessment was therefore held void and quashed. On the addition under s. 69A for a gold bar found in the assessee&#039;s locker, the ITAT held the AO and CIT(A) failed to rebut the declaration and affidavit explaining the source; the addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1332 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783792</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was the validity of an assessment framed under s. 153A r/w s. 143(3) based on material seized in a search of a third party. The ITAT held that s. 153A can be invoked only where a search is conducted on the assessee and incriminating material is found at the assessee&#039;s premises; if the AO seeks to rely on third-party search material, the proper jurisdictional provision is s. 153C. The assessment was therefore held void and quashed. On the addition under s. 69A for a gold bar found in the assessee&#039;s locker, the ITAT held the AO and CIT(A) failed to rebut the declaration and affidavit explaining the source; the addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>