<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1335 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783795</link>
    <description>For TP adjustment in respect of research support services, the Tribunal held that a selected comparable company had turnover of only about INR 3.65 crores and therefore failed the applicable turnover filter; the AO/TPO was directed to rework the benchmarking after correctly applying filters and excluding that comparable, and recompute any consequential adjustment. On disallowance of employees&#039; provident fund contribution for alleged delay, it held that the assessee had remitted the amount within the stipulated due date and the non-credit to the EPFO within time occurred due to technical banking glitches beyond the assessee&#039;s control; accordingly, the SC ruling in Checkmate Services was held inapplicable and the disallowance was deleted, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1335 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783795</link>
      <description>For TP adjustment in respect of research support services, the Tribunal held that a selected comparable company had turnover of only about INR 3.65 crores and therefore failed the applicable turnover filter; the AO/TPO was directed to rework the benchmarking after correctly applying filters and excluding that comparable, and recompute any consequential adjustment. On disallowance of employees&#039; provident fund contribution for alleged delay, it held that the assessee had remitted the amount within the stipulated due date and the non-credit to the EPFO within time occurred due to technical banking glitches beyond the assessee&#039;s control; accordingly, the SC ruling in Checkmate Services was held inapplicable and the disallowance was deleted, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>