<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1339 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783799</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether a charitable trust validly claimed accumulation of income under s.11(2) where Form No.10 stated a broadly worded &quot;specific purpose&quot; for future needs. The ITAT held that the trust&#039;s activities during the relevant AY were demonstrably in furtherance of its stated objects, satisfying the statutory conditions for exemption. It further held that the purpose mentioned in Form No.10, though general due to space constraints, remained consonant with the trust&#039;s major objects and was not shown by the Revenue to be outside the trust deed or otherwise non-compliant; nor was any misuse or breach of s.11(2) alleged. Consequently, accumulation was allowed and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1339 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783799</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether a charitable trust validly claimed accumulation of income under s.11(2) where Form No.10 stated a broadly worded &quot;specific purpose&quot; for future needs. The ITAT held that the trust&#039;s activities during the relevant AY were demonstrably in furtherance of its stated objects, satisfying the statutory conditions for exemption. It further held that the purpose mentioned in Form No.10, though general due to space constraints, remained consonant with the trust&#039;s major objects and was not shown by the Revenue to be outside the trust deed or otherwise non-compliant; nor was any misuse or breach of s.11(2) alleged. Consequently, accumulation was allowed and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>