<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1342 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783802</link>
    <description>For a non-searched person, the six- or ten-assessment-year period under section 153C is reckoned from the date the Assessing Officer records satisfaction for that person. Applying that jurisdictional rule, and following the earlier binding decision on the same factual matrix, the relevant assessment years fell outside the permissible block period. The assessments were therefore made without valid assumption of jurisdiction and were invalid as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1342 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783802</link>
      <description>For a non-searched person, the six- or ten-assessment-year period under section 153C is reckoned from the date the Assessing Officer records satisfaction for that person. Applying that jurisdictional rule, and following the earlier binding decision on the same factual matrix, the relevant assessment years fell outside the permissible block period. The assessments were therefore made without valid assumption of jurisdiction and were invalid as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>