<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1343 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783803</link>
    <description>Reimbursements received from Indian group entities for salary paid to seconded employees were held not to constitute Fee for Technical Services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12(4) of the India-Japan DTAA. The Tribunal treated the payments as salary reimbursements on a cost-to-cost basis, with no mark-up, and noted that the secondees worked under the control of the Indian entities. It also relied on the fact that tax had been deducted at source on the salary payments. On these facts, the reimbursement could not be recharacterised as consideration for technical services and was therefore outside the FTS charge under both the Act and the treaty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1343 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783803</link>
      <description>Reimbursements received from Indian group entities for salary paid to seconded employees were held not to constitute Fee for Technical Services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12(4) of the India-Japan DTAA. The Tribunal treated the payments as salary reimbursements on a cost-to-cost basis, with no mark-up, and noted that the secondees worked under the control of the Indian entities. It also relied on the fact that tax had been deducted at source on the salary payments. On these facts, the reimbursement could not be recharacterised as consideration for technical services and was therefore outside the FTS charge under both the Act and the treaty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>