<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1349 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783809</link>
    <description>Entitlement to exemption for a political party under s.13A turned on statutory compliance and genuineness of contributions. The Tribunal held the assessee failed to show substantial compliance with s.139(4B) filing within time, maintenance of audited books, and proper contribution reporting; further, donor statements and a statement recorded u/s 132(4) established a cash-return arrangement with 5-8% commission, rendering donors bogus and contributions non-voluntary, which independently justified denial of s.13A exemption. Consequently, exemption was denied. Separately, the Tribunal held s.68 could not be invoked because rejected donation claims/commission could not be treated as unexplained cash credits; the s.68 additions were deleted and income was directed to be recomputed at 6% of total contributions as &quot;income from other sources&quot; u/s 56(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1349 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783809</link>
      <description>Entitlement to exemption for a political party under s.13A turned on statutory compliance and genuineness of contributions. The Tribunal held the assessee failed to show substantial compliance with s.139(4B) filing within time, maintenance of audited books, and proper contribution reporting; further, donor statements and a statement recorded u/s 132(4) established a cash-return arrangement with 5-8% commission, rendering donors bogus and contributions non-voluntary, which independently justified denial of s.13A exemption. Consequently, exemption was denied. Separately, the Tribunal held s.68 could not be invoked because rejected donation claims/commission could not be treated as unexplained cash credits; the s.68 additions were deleted and income was directed to be recomputed at 6% of total contributions as &quot;income from other sources&quot; u/s 56(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>