<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1350 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783810</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether receipts labelled as &quot;donations/membership fees&quot; during religious events constituted commercial/advertisement income disentitling the trust to exemption under ss. 11-12 read with s. 2(15). The ITAT held the trust&#039;s objects were religious and cultural, not &quot;general public utility,&quot; so the proviso to s. 2(15) was inapplicable; even otherwise, the disputed receipts were well below the statutory 20% threshold, so no disqualification arose, and exemption could not be denied. On characterisation, the Tribunal found the amounts were applied to declared religious activities and construction of a dharmshala, with donor name display being mere acknowledgment without profit motive or commercial benefit, hence not business consideration; the additions were deleted and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1350 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783810</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether receipts labelled as &quot;donations/membership fees&quot; during religious events constituted commercial/advertisement income disentitling the trust to exemption under ss. 11-12 read with s. 2(15). The ITAT held the trust&#039;s objects were religious and cultural, not &quot;general public utility,&quot; so the proviso to s. 2(15) was inapplicable; even otherwise, the disputed receipts were well below the statutory 20% threshold, so no disqualification arose, and exemption could not be denied. On characterisation, the Tribunal found the amounts were applied to declared religious activities and construction of a dharmshala, with donor name display being mere acknowledgment without profit motive or commercial benefit, hence not business consideration; the additions were deleted and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>